|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009年02 期
| 标题 |
| 厦门翔安海底隧道CRD法和双侧壁法穿越砂层对比分析(30 卷) |
| 英文标题 |
| Comparative Analysis on the Adaptability of CRD and Dual Sidewall Guide Pit for Passing through the Sand Layer of Xiamen Xiangan Seabed Tunnel |
| 摘要 |
| 摘要：针对厦门翔安海底隧道采用交叉中隔壁法(CRD)和双侧壁法穿越砂层的适应性，运用摩尔库仑准则和FLAC3D软件进行弹塑性数值计算，分析采用CRD法和双侧壁法2种工法时的塑性区发展及分布情况，并将计算结果与实测结果进行比对。结果表明，采用这2种工法时引起的隧道变形相差 |
| 作者 |
| 新闻作者:郭衍敬 ,黄明琦 ,陈铁林，张顶立 |
| 关键字 |
