|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010年12 期
| 标题 |
| 筏板式与桩帽式CFG桩数值对比分析(50 卷) |
| 英文标题 |
| Numerical comparative analysis between raft-type and capped-type CFG (Cement Fly-ash Gravel) piles |
| 摘要 |
| 从研究CFG桩复合地基的沉降出发，应用PLAXIS二维有限元分析软件对新建铁路曲阜站路基沉降进行了分析，比较了用带桩帽和带筏板的CFG桩加固地基后对地基沉降的影响。分析表明，两种CFG桩复合地基的最终沉降相差较小，均能满足设计要求。带筏板和带桩帽的CFG桩复合地基在坡脚处 |
| 作者 |
| 新闻作者:蒋宗全，曹玉新，马耀先，曲宏略，朱浩波 |
| 关键字 |
